Challenging two long-standing norms in financial advice: home-buying and long-term care insurance

S.F. Ehrlich Associates |

Housing: While there have been periods of time when owning a home was a costly endeavor (most recently during the housing crisis of 2008-2009), the argument of rent vs. buy has usually fallen on the side of ‘buy.’ Beg, borrow, or steal a down payment, pay mortgage and property taxes religiously, and cash out when it’s time to move on. That sounds almost as American as hot dogs, baseball, and apple pie. Until now.

The Wall Street Journal1 recently reported that “Home-Buying Math No Longer Adds Up.” In fact, “It is now less affordable than any time in recent history to buy a home, and the math isn’t changing any time soon.” There are multiple reasons why:

  • Prices that moved higher during the pandemic and aren’t coming down;
  • Historically low mortgage rates rapidly moved higher with inflation;
  • Demand for homes currently exceeds supply.

While rents have also increased, the Journal notes, “The average monthly new mortgage payment is 52% higher than the average apartment rent.”

Thus, for the first time in years, building equity in a home may not currently be as attractive an option for many first-time and young buyers. If you have adult children who might be in the market looking for a home, share the sobering news, and have them do the math before they buy.


Long-term care insurance: The gold standard for aging seniors concerned about care as they age is owning a long-term care insurance policy. Long-term care insurance policies provide payments to cover the costs of an aide in your home, along with the care should a stay in a nursing or extended care facility be required. But the gold standard is in jeopardy2.

As a result of a lawsuit that was settled in March 2023, Genworth, the company with the largest block of long-term care insurance policies, agreed to provide a variety of options to existing policyholders. These options range from alternative policies with lower premiums and fixed (or reduced) benefits to maintaining existing policies but face premium increases that range from 130 to more than 600 percent!

Unlike car insurance, premium increases for long-term care policies are class-based. If an individual gets in a car accident, for example, there’s a high probability his/her auto insurance premiums will increase. In the long-term care insurance space, every member of the class gets the same rate increase once approved by the state insurance commissioner.

With premium increases causing policies to be prohibitively expensive for many policyholders, it will be incumbent for policy owners (and their financial advisors) to determine which reduced benefit will be the most beneficial to cover potential future long-term care needs.

For many, this will be a difficult balancing act. For others, the notion that long-term care needs were covered forever will be wiped away.


1 Heeb, Gina. “The Math for Buying a Home No Longer Works.” The Wall Street Journal, 11 Dec. 2023.
2 Carrns, Ann. “Difficult Choices for Some Long-Term Care Policyholders.” The New York Times, 15 Dec. 2023.



Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results.  Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by S.F. Ehrlich Associates, Inc. (“SFEA”), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this newsletter will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful.  Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this newsletter serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from SFEA.  To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing.  SFEA is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the newsletter content should be construed as legal or accounting advice.  A copy of SFEA’s current written disclosure Brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available upon request. If you are a SFEA client, please remember to contact SFEA, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing, evaluating, or revising our previous recommendations and/or service.